<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Bohr. Amr.</journal-id>
<journal-title>BOHR International Journal of Advances in Management Research</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Bohr. Amr.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2583-6943</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>BOHR</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.54646/bijamr.2026.48</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>An exploratory study on workers attitudes and job satisfaction in relation to work dynamics in construction firms in Mangaluru</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Anasuya</surname></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff><institution>Department of Business Administration, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara College of Business Management</institution>, <addr-line>Mangalore</addr-line>, <country>India</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Anasuya, <email>anasuya@sdmcbm.ac.in</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p><bold><sup>&#x2020;</sup>ORCID:</bold> Anasuya <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0833-8941">0009-0001-0833-8941</ext-link></p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>30</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>5</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>58</fpage>
<lpage>62</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>13</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>09</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2026 Anasuya.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Anasuya</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>&#x00A9; The Author(s). 2024 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Human resources are the most valuable asset of any organization. They represent the sum total of inherent abilities, acquired knowledge, and skills reflected in the talents and aptitudes of managerial and non-managerial employees. It may be noted that human resources should be utilized to the maximum possible extent in order to achieve both individual and organizational goals. The study aims to identify workers&#x2019; attitudes and job satisfaction in construction firms in Mangaluru City. Research data were collected from 145 workers who are employed on construction projects in Mangaluru City. The research results show that the factors that positively affect workers&#x2019; attitudes and job satisfaction include working conditions, work environment, nature of work, and compensation. Finally, the study proposes several administrative implications to improve the job satisfaction of construction workers in Mangaluru City.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>job satisfaction</kwd>
<kwd>human goals</kwd>
<kwd>attitudes</kwd>
<kwd>human resource</kwd>
<kwd>workers</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="0"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="12"/>
<page-count count="5"/>
<word-count count="2812"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="S1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Worker attitude and job satisfaction deal with how an organization functions. They involve management guiding employees toward improving both organizational and personal effectiveness. These factors play an enormous role in shaping employees&#x2019; attitudes and their level of job satisfaction. When an employee is happy, it is usually because they are satisfied with their work, which in turn improves the quality of their performance. Attitude and job satisfaction do not depend entirely on management alone but also on employees themselves. If employees enjoy their work, they may not require external motivation from management; instead, the satisfaction they gain from completing their work becomes a motivating factor.</p>
<p>Job satisfaction refers to an individual&#x2019;s level of contentment with their work. Its effect on productivity may be either positive or negative. However, the relationship between job satisfaction and job productivity is not always consistent. An individual may still achieve high productivity without being satisfied with their work, particularly when monetary rewards serve as the primary motivation. Another motivator may be the desire to improve performance in order to receive a promotion. In contrast, some employees increase their productivity due to the satisfaction they derive from their work. Job satisfaction may also result from receiving a fair salary, as it improves satisfaction when employees perceive that they are adequately compensated for their efforts.</p>
<p>Job satisfaction also influences an individual&#x2019;s overall satisfaction with life. When employees do not find satisfaction in their work, they may seek fulfillment in other non-work-related areas, which helps provide balance in their lives. They may also feel content with their work when it aligns well with these non-work-related aspects. Conversely, job dissatisfaction may lead an employee to leave the organization.</p>
<sec id="S1.SS1">
<title>Literature review</title>
<p>Job satisfaction has long been recognized as a central variable in organizational behavior research. Edwin A. Locke (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>) defined job satisfaction as a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one&#x2019;s job or job experiences. His foundational work identified intrinsic and extrinsic factors such as achievement, recognition, supervision, and working conditions as primary determinants.</p>
<p>Building upon this foundation, Barrett and Barrett (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>) emphasized the significant role of job satisfaction in employee retention, particularly in the construction sector. Their findings suggest that higher job satisfaction reduces turnover intentions and strengthens organizational commitment.</p>
<p>Similarly, James L. Price examined determinants of voluntary turnover and concluded that job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and job alternatives are primary predictors of employee retention. More recently, Shin and Cho (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>) found that job insecurity significantly reduces job satisfaction and increases turnover intention in the construction industry, highlighting the importance of employment stability.</p>
<p>Bernard M. Bass (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>) introduced transformational leadership theory, distinguishing it from transactional leadership. Transformational leaders inspire, motivate, and intellectually stimulate employees, fostering higher levels of satisfaction and organizational commitment.</p>
<p>In addition, Gerstner and Day (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>) conducted a meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory. Their study demonstrated that high-quality leader-member relationships are strongly associated with job satisfaction, performance, and reduced turnover. These findings reinforce the importance of leadership style in employee retention strategies.</p>
<p>Workplace safety and well-being are critical in construction environments due to the industry&#x2019;s high-risk nature. Danna and Griffin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>) synthesized literature on workplace health and well-being, concluding that physical and psychological health significantly influence job satisfaction and productivity.</p>
<p>In the construction context, Gyi and Porter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>) found that improved safety practices positively impact worker job satisfaction. Further, Hinze et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>) emphasized systematic safety management as a key factor in reducing accidents and enhancing workforce morale. Likewise, Helen Lingard and Rowlinson (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>) highlighted the role of structured safety management systems in improving employee satisfaction and project performance.</p>
<p>Chan et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>) identified key success factors such as effective communication, competent project teams, leadership, and proper risk management.</p>
<p>Cheng and Li (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>) examined the role of social support in construction projects. Their study revealed that supervisory and peer support significantly enhance employee satisfaction and reduce workplace stress, thereby contributing to project effectiveness.</p>
<p>Sandya Sri Aprilia et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>), in their study, highlighted the <bold>work environment</bold> as a key factor influencing job satisfaction. A safe, comfortable, and supportive work environment helps employees perform their duties effectively and reduces stress. In construction companies, good physical conditions and positive workplace relationships increase employee satisfaction. Studies also indicate that <bold>work-life balance</bold> plays a significant role in job satisfaction. Employees who are able to balance their work responsibilities with personal life experience lower stress and higher job satisfaction. Supportive policies and reasonable working hours help improve this balance. Further literature confirms that the <bold>combined effect of work environment and work-life balance</bold> has a strong positive impact on employee job satisfaction. When both factors work together, they create a safe, effective, and satisfying workplace.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S2">
<title>Methodology</title>
<p>Methodology is considered the nerve of the project, as it guides the research process and helps in reaching meaningful conclusions. Without a proper methodology, it is impossible to complete a project or arrive at valid findings. The present project is based on a survey method. The main objective of the survey was to collect appropriate data that serve as the basis for drawing conclusions and obtaining results. Thus, methodology provides a systematic way to solve the research problem.</p>
<p>Data may be collected for either theoretical or practical research. For example, management research may be conceptually framed along with operational planning, strategic methods, and change management practices. The present study has adopted a descriptive research design.</p>
<sec id="S2.SS1">
<title>Data sources</title>
<p>In tune with the objectives mentioned above, the present study collects data from both primary and secondary sources.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2">
<title>Primary data</title>
<p>Primary data are those data that are collected directly from the respondents and are considered first-hand information. In this study, primary data were gathered with the help of a structured questionnaire distributed among the selected sample respondents of the company.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS3">
<title>Secondary data</title>
<p>Secondary data are those that have already been collected and published by various sources. In the present study, secondary data were collected from company records and web-based resources.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS4">
<title>Sample size</title>
<p>The sample size selected for this research project consists of 145 employees.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS5">
<title>Sampling technique</title>
<p>A closed-ended questionnaire was provided on quantitative aspects along with a Likert scale to 145 respondents using Google Forms.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S3">
<title>Research gap</title>
<p>Although prior studies have identified leadership style, workplace safety, social support, job insecurity, work environment, and work&#x2013;life balance as important determinants of job satisfaction, there is a lack of comprehensive research integrating these factors within a unified framework to examine their combined impact on employee retention in the construction industry.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4">
<title>Objectives</title>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>To understand employees&#x2019; attitudes toward their working environment.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>To assess the level of job satisfaction among employees in the construction company.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>To offer suggestions to management for improving employees&#x2019; attitudes.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="S5">
<title>Limitation of the study</title>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>The study is limited to construction firms in Mangaluru City only.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>The sample size of 145 workers may not represent the entire population.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>The study is exploratory in nature and does not establish cause-and-effect relationships.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>The data are based on self-reported responses, which may include personal bias.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Only selected factors such as working conditions, environment, nature of work, and compensation were considered.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>The study was conducted within a limited time period.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>The unorganized nature of the construction sector may affect response accuracy.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Language and literacy differences among workers may influence understanding of the questionnaire.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="S6">
<title>Result analysis</title>
<p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>, a demographic analysis was performed using the variables gender, age, marital status, work experience, and monthly income category among the 145 respondents who participated in the research. The table presents the frequency distribution of respondents across different categories of each demographic variable. The analysis of the table shows that among the 145 respondents, 67.6% are male and 32.4% are female. With respect to age, 33.8% of respondents fall in the age group below 20 years, 16.6% in the age group of 20&#x2013;25 years, 19.3% in the age group of 26&#x2013;30 years, and 29.0% in the age group of 31&#x2013;35 years, while the majority are above 36 years of age. According to the study, unmarried respondents (58.0%) are more numerous than married respondents. Regarding average monthly income, 12.4% of respondents reported an income above &#x20B9;40,000, 33.1% reported an income between &#x20B9;30,000 and &#x20B9;40,000, 35.9% reported an income between &#x20B9;20,000 and &#x20B9;30,000, and 18.6% reported an income below &#x20B9;20,000. The majority of workers are employed on a temporary basis, accounting for 63.0% of the respondents.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>Socio-demographic factor summary.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Factors</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Options</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">No of respondents</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Percentage (%)</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Gender</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Male</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">98</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">67.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Female</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">47</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">32.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">20&#x2013;25</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">24</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">16.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">26&#x2013;30</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">28</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">19.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">31&#x2013;35</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">42</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">29.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">36 and above</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">51</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">35.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Marital status</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Married</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">61</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Unmarried</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">84</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Experience</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1&#x2013;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">35</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">4&#x2013;6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">32</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">8&#x2013;10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">51</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">11 and above</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">27</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Monthly income</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Above 40,000</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">18</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">30,000&#x2013;40,000</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">48</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">33.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">20,000&#x2013;30,000</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">52</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">35.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Below 20,000</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">27</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">18.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Status of work</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Permanent</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">53</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">37</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Temporary</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">92</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">63</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>Source: Primary data.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>, an analysis of workers&#x2019; attitudes was conducted using variables such as work environment, working hours, workload, relationships with co-workers, and work-related stress among all 145 respondents who participated in the research. The findings are as follows:</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>Workers attitude towards work.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Factors</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Options</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">No of respondents</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Percentage (%)</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Opinion of the workers towards working environment</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Good</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="left">Satisfactory</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">52</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="left">Not satisfactory</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>35</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>24</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Opinion about working hours</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Very happy</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">37</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="left">Happy</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">49</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">34</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="left">Not happy</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">59</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Opinion about heavy work load</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Yes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">95</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">66</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="left">No</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">50</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">34</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Relationship with the fellow workers</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Good</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">48</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="left">Satisfactory</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">64</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="left">Not satisfactory</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">33</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Opinion about stress</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Yes</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">68</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">47</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="left"><bold>No</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">77</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">53</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>Source: Primary data.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p><bold>Work environment:</bold> Among the respondents, 40% rated the work environment as good, 36% as satisfactory, and 24% as unsatisfactory.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p><bold>Working hours:</bold> With respect to working hours, 26% of the respondents reported being very happy, 34% were happy, while 41% expressed dissatisfaction.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p><bold>Workload:</bold> A significant proportion of respondents (66%) stated that they faced a heavy workload, whereas 34% reported no such issue.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p><bold>Relationships with co-workers:</bold> About 33% of respondents reported having good relationships with their co-workers, 44% indicated moderate relationships, and 23% were dissatisfied.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p><bold>Work-related stress:</bold> In terms of stress, 47% of the respondents acknowledged experiencing work-related stress, while 53% stated that they did not experience any stress.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
<p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>, an analysis of workers&#x2019; satisfaction was conducted using variables such as leaves and holidays, salary and welfare measures, supervisor behavior, shift system, and job security among all 145 respondents who participated in the research. The findings are as follows:</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption><p>Workers satisfaction towards work.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Factors</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Options</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">No of respondents</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Percentage (%)</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Opinion about the leaves and holidays</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Good</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">43</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="left">Satisfactory</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">64</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="left">Not satisfactory</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">38</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Opinion about salary, safety &#x0026; welfare measures</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Good</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">42</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="left">Satisfactory</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">49</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">34</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="left">Not satisfactory</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">54</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">37</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Opinion about supervisor</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Motivator</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">34</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="left">Not Motivating</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">64</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="left">Rude</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">47</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Opinion about shift system</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Good</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">33</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="left">Satisfactory</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">47</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="left">Not satisfactory</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">65</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Opinion about job security</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Yes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">76</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="left">No</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">69</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">48</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>Source: Primary data.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<sec id="S6.SS1">
<title>Opinion about leaves and holidays</title>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>30% of the respondents rated their leaves and holidays as good.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>44% considered them satisfactory.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>However, 26% were not satisfied with the leaves and holidays provided.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="S6.SS2">
<title>Opinion about salary, safety, and welfare measures</title>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Only 29% of the respondents found salary, safety, and welfare measures to be good.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>34% rated them as satisfactory.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>A notable 37% expressed dissatisfaction with these aspects.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="S6.SS3">
<title>Opinion about supervisors</title>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>23% of the respondents viewed their supervisors as motivators.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>44% felt that their supervisors were not motivating.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>32% described their supervisors as rude, indicating a significant concern in this area.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="S6.SS4">
<title>Opinion about the shift system</title>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>23% of the respondents rated the shift system as good.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>32% found it satisfactory.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>However, 45% were dissatisfied with the shift system, making it a major area of concern.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="S6.SS5">
<title>Opinion about job security</title>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>52% of the respondents felt secure in their jobs.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Meanwhile, 48% expressed concerns about job security, indicating an almost equal division in perception.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S7" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Management should help employees understand that they are not just employees, but valuable assets of the organization.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Management should provide proper leave facilities without disturbing the regular work schedule, for example, by offering restricted holidays or increasing the number of paid leaves.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Ensuring job security for permanent employees, along with medical facilities, helps retain experienced staff in the organization.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>The shift system should be assigned to employees based on their preferences and willingness.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Workload should be reduced to allow employees to take greater interest and perform effectively in their jobs.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Working hours should be adjusted according to the preferences and convenience of the workers.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>A proper grievance redressal system should be implemented to reduce work-related stress among employees.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Conduct regular <bold>safety training</bold>, update personal protective equipment (PPE), and implement clear hazard reporting systems to boost trust and morale among workers.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Conducting regular surveys or informal check-ins can help to understand specific worker needs before implementing programs.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="S8" sec-type="conclusion">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Assigning the right person to the right job enables employees to perform their work efficiently and diligently. A supportive organizational environment motivates employees and encourages flexibility, allowing them to adapt to changing work conditions. Conflicts among employees are managed constructively by the organization. The objectives of the organization are clearly communicated and understood by the employees, ensuring alignment with organizational goals.</p>
<p>The company should continue to inspire and guide employees to achieve these goals. Management plays a key role in directing and supporting employees toward accomplishing the organization&#x2019;s objectives. By fostering confidence, enthusiasm, and a willingness to contribute, management helps employees actively participate in attaining the organization&#x2019;s vision.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="S9" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author declares that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S10">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Locke</surname> <given-names>EA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The nature and causes of job satisfaction.</article-title> In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Dunnette</surname> <given-names>MD</given-names></name></person-group><role>editor.</role> <source><italic>Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Chicago</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Rand McNally</publisher-name> (<year>1976</year>). p. <fpage>1297</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>349</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barrett</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barrett</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The role of job satisfaction in employee retention.</article-title> <source><italic>J Constr Eng Manag.</italic></source> (<year>2007</year>) <volume>133</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>442</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shin</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cho</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Impact of job insecurity on job satisfaction and turnover intention in the construction industry.</article-title> <source><italic>J Constr Eng Manag.</italic></source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>146</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>04020037</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bass</surname> <given-names>BM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>From transactional to transformational leadership: learning to share the vision.</article-title> <source><italic>Organ Dyn</italic>.</source> (<year>1990</year>) <volume>18</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>19</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gerstner</surname> <given-names>CR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Day</surname> <given-names>DV</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: correlates and construct issues.</article-title> <source><italic>J Appl Psychol.</italic></source> (<year>1997</year>) <volume>82</volume>(<issue>6</issue>): <fpage>827</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Danna</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Griffin</surname> <given-names>RW</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Health and well-being in the workplace: a review and synthesis of the literature.</article-title> <source><italic>J Organ Behav.</italic></source> (<year>1999</year>) <volume>20</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>391</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>413</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gyi</surname> <given-names>DE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Porter</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Construction safety: improving worker job satisfaction.</article-title> <source><italic>J Saf Res.</italic></source> (<year>2007</year>) <volume>38</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>303</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hinze</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hallowell</surname> <given-names>MR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baud</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> <source><italic>Construction Safety Management and Engineering.</italic></source> <publisher-name>Prentice-Hall</publisher-name> (<year>2013</year>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lingard</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rowlinson</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> <source><italic>Construction Safety Management.</italic></source> <publisher-name>Pearson Education</publisher-name> (<year>2005</year>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chan</surname> <given-names>DW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scott</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chan</surname> <given-names>AP</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Factors affecting the success of a construction project.</article-title> <source><italic>Int J Proj Manag.</italic></source> (<year>2004</year>) <volume>22</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>45</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>56</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Social support and employee satisfaction in construction projects.</article-title> <source><italic>J Constr Manag Econ.</italic></source> (<year>2008</year>) <volume>26</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>437</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aprilia</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luwiski</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Solahudin</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sunimah</surname></name></person-group>. <source><italic>Impact of Work Environment and Work-Life Balance on Job Satisfaction.</italic></source> (<year>2025</year>).</citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
