Mechanochemistry’s role in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs development: A review

Mohammad Alrbaihat1* and Ehab AlShamaileh2

*Correspondence:
Mohammad Alrbaihat,
moh.irbeihat83@hotmail.com

Received: 11 August 2022; Accepted: 28 August 2022; Published: 06 September 2022.

As a greener method of preparing molecules, mechanochemistry has recently been identified as an ideal strategy for preparing diverse molecules. It is becoming a valuable synthetic tool for multiple fields (e.g., physics, chemistry, and materials science) because it can be performed without solvents or with minimal solvents (catalytic quantities). The use of sustainable methods has been beneficial to several fields of chemistry, including pharmaceuticals, fertilizers, catalysis, organic synthesis, preparation of medicinal solid forms, and synthesis of metal complexes. Pharmaceutical and pharmaceutical chemistry will likely be significantly impacted by these developments in medicinal mechanochemistry. Due to their reactivity and materials, they provide materials that are hard to extract from a solution or are not possible. Nevertheless, these technologies could provide the pharmaceutical sector with safer, cleaner, and more effective synthetic solutions. The importance of mechanochemical processes in the creation of pharmaceutical cocrystals, especially non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), is discussed in this article.

Keywords: mechanochemistry, solvent-free, cocrystal, NSAIDs, pharmaceutical

1. Introduction

Pharmaceuticals are considered to be a significant environmental problem by environmentalists in the last few years because pharmaceutically active substances (PASs) can negatively impact the chemical and biological processes taking place in land and aquatic habitats and cause pollution (1).

Sulfamethoxazole, naproxen, and sulfasalazine have been documented to persist in the environment for much longer than a year. Clofibric acid has been reported to persist for more than 21 years (2). It is undoubtedly true that the environment and human health may be severely harmed by extremely long lifespans. Recently, mechanochemistry has gained attention as an effective and non-polluting technique that can be used to treat waste (3). The removal of asbestos-containing materials in particular has been so effective that no patent for the transformation of toxic asbestos fibers into non-toxic amorphous asbestos has been granted (4, 5).

In recent years, chemists have become increasingly interested in mechanochemistry (3, 611). The two most popular types of milling are mechanical and manual methods for promoting mechanochemistry. A mortar and pestle are used for hand grinding, while planetary mills or mixer/shaker mills are used for mechanical grinding at frequencies of 5−0 Hz. Compared to manual grinding, mechanical milling generates far more energy and is more dependable and complex; this method produces more consistent experimental results. In contrast, hand grinding may yield varying results, depending on grinding strength and speed (1214).

Sometimes mechanical milling is referred to as grinding in the literature. There are two types of mechanical and chemical methods. It is strongly advised to use the word “grinding,” particularly when referring to using a mortar and pestle or anything like a Retsch RM100 mortar grinder. Only components being milled in a mixer/shaker mill or a planetary mill are covered by the word “milling” (1517). There are a wide variety of mixers and planetary mills available commercially as well as homemade high-speed vibration mills (HSVM), commercially accessible Fritsch Pulverisette, Retsch mixer mills, Spex CertiPrep mixers and mills planetaries, AGO-2 Planetary Centrifugal Mills, and so on. Since mechanical milling is always carried out using milling balls in a mixer or planetary mill, it is often referred to as ball milling (1719).

As a green, highly efficient method of producing materials, mechanical synthesis has gained popularity in a variety of fields (e.g., physics, chemistry, and materials science) (2023). Mechanochemical studies have played an increasingly significant role over the past several decades in many application fields, as shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.bohrpub.com

Table 1. Potential future applications of mechanochemical synthesis.

Over the past three decades, interest in mechanochemistry has increased dramatically, especially as it pertains to pharmaceutical materials. Several independent studies have demonstrated that mechanochemistry is an effective method for gaining access to additional solid forms and is often as effective as other approach materials (61). (62) evaluated mechanochemistry extensively. Tan and Friščić (53) identified numerous other fields where this technology is likely to be used as a screening strategy.

This evaluation focuses especially on the important role of mechanochemistry in the formation, modifications, and development of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as pharmaceutical compounds. Since the apparent equilibrium attained under certain settings frequently does not match the thermodynamic equilibrium but is instead connected to the experimental parameters utilized, mechanochemistry does actually provide favorable conditions for the identification of less stable forms.

2. Mechanochemical aspects

During the 4th century BC, cinnabar and acetic acid were ground together in a copper vessel to produce elements from mercury, according to Takacs (8). Similarly, Aristotle’s statement “reaction cannot occur without solvent” (53) also points to a significant early reference point. According to his statement, it is impossible to conduct many solventless mechanochemical reactions (63). Mechanochemistry was developed in the Middle Ages and found use in mining and metallurgy as well, as evidenced by references to various studies (17, 64, 65).

The term mechanochemistry is habitually utilized from a wide perspective, covering any substance response instigated precisely (e.g., by crushing, pounding, and so on) (64). This is the meaning in which it is used in this investigation. It has been argued elsewhere that this widespread use is incorrect and that it should only be used when mechanical energy directly destroys solid bonds (such as in polymers or unquestionably in single molecules) (10). This creates receptive focuses (frequently revolutionaries) that go through additional responses. This more prohibitive utilization of the term would avoid crushing responses that might continue to a great extent because of an expansion in the contact surface region between reactants (as the particles become more modest and all the more personally blended).

A mechanochemical reaction is described by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) as a “chemical reaction that is induced by the direct absorption of mechanical energy,” with the caveat that “shearing, stretching, and grinding are typical methods for the mechanochemical generation of reactive sites, usually macroradicals, in polymer chains that undergo mechanochemical reactions” (64). While the note provides recommendations for its application in the context of polymers, the underlying definition is broad and unrestricted in terms of the atomic scale process. As a result, the term’s widespread use appears to be warranted. There may also be some misunderstanding about what is meant by “solvent-free.” To begin with, the terms “solvent-free” and “mechanochemistry” are not synonymous because mechanochemistry can be performed in the presence of solvents. Nonetheless, the term “solvent-free” has more than one meaning (11, 36, 64). The method emphasizes a practical advantage by not introducing a solvent on purpose into the reaction. While interpreting how these reactions operate mechanistically (especially how fluidity develops), it may be incorrect to view this reaction as solvent-free. Molecular solvates or hydrated metal salts are examples of solid raw materials that can be used as solvents.

FIGURE 1
www.bohrpub.com

Figure 1. Synthetic fields of mechanochemistry.

There could be (lower) amounts of moisture in non-formally hydrated objects or the environment that help the reaction. Condensates can also produce species such as water and acetic acid. As a result, while the term “solvent-free” is frequently correct in practice, care must be exercised when making mechanical interpretations (6, 66).

As shown in scheme 1, mechanochemistry has recently had a significant impact in a wide range of synthetic fields of chemistry, including agricultural synthesis (34, 67), synthesis of organometallic compounds (68, 69), organic synthesis (38, 70, 71), metal complexes preparation (72), main group elements (73), porous metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) (74), polymers (75, 76), food and nutrition (77, 78), and multicomponent pharmaceutical materials (79, 80).

Mechanical reactions are reactions that are initiated by mechanical methods (milling, grinding, and compression) and are carried out either without solvent or with solvent at levels that are catalytic (20, 21, 34). These techniques have been used since the Stone Age when mortars and pestles were used to prepare foods, medicines, and other items, as shown in Table 1. In 1919, Ostwald classified mechanochemistry as the fourth category of chemical processes including thermochemistry, photochemistry, and electrochemistry (8, 13). The mechanochemistry field is coming back, primarily because of the green perspective associated with not requiring any solvents.

3. Mechanochemistry and pharmaceutical materials

Mechanochemistry and pharmaceutical sciences are inextricably linked. The structure of organic molecules must be understood at both the molecular (e.g., the macroscale, such as particle size and shape) and microscopic (such as crystal structure) levels to determine properties such as solubility, dissolving rate, tablet ability, and heat, and moisture stability (21, 53, 81). As a result, solid-state pharmaceutical materials research has primarily focused on influencing API properties in the solid states by altering their molecular arrangement. Examples are amorphization, polymerization, salts, crystalline solutions and, more recently, pharmaceutical cocrystals (25, 73, 82).

However, there are different pharmaceutical applications of mechanochemistry as illustrated in scheme 2 (38, 70, 83, 84).

FIGURE 2
www.bohrpub.com

Figure 2. Pharmaceutical applications of mechanochemistry (38, 70, 83, 84).

For the last 15 years, there has been an increased emphasis on solid-state synthesis methods for the exploration and synthesis of active pharmaceutical ingredients API solid forms (81). Mechanochemistry has gained considerable attention, but so has vapor-assisted reactivity (e.g., faster aging and vapor digestion) (16). Solvent-drop grinding, also known as liquid-assisted grinding (LAG), or kneading (19, 36), has been especially successful in identifying novel polymorphs, salts, and cocrystals in the bulk formulation of APIs, in addition to producing large quantities of them (through batch or continuous processing processes, such as twin-screw extrusion [TSE]). By complexing a transition or main group of metal cations (21), this technique has also been extended to the generation of novel API forms and even known metallodrugs.

Cocrystals/multicomponent salts (85) and amorphous (42) are two ways of preparing pharmacological solid forms. Solvent-free solid-state procedures, on the contrary, have recently attracted a lot of attention since they may be carried out without or with very little solvent (catalytic amounts). According to Grant et al., the molecular structure and supramolecular arrangement of a drug influence its intrinsic activity, resulting in mechanochemical activation (73, 86).

For the production of comparable therapeutic molecules, standard chemical procedures involve the use of hazardous solvents and high pressures (87). From both a theoretical and practical standpoint, it is critical and necessary to eliminate these stages. A mechanochemistry technique can be used to create a green chemical process (9, 13). Many recent investigations have demonstrated that mechanochemistry is successful in synthesizing NSAIDs as pharmaceutical molecules, which are the building blocks for more sophisticated organosilicon syntheses (29, 88).

4. Mechanochemistry of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are among the most often given medications and delivered medications in the world (89). NSAIDs are used by roughly 30 million individuals every day, accounting for around 5−10% of all drugs administered each year (90). Ibuprofen, indomethacin, meloxicam, and aceclofenac are some of the medications in this class. NSAIDs offer a wide range of benefits and risks, but they are commonly used as analgesics, anti-inflammatory drugs, and antipyretics (90, 91).

According to the Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS), several NSAIDs are classified as Class II medicines (poor water solubility and high intestinal permeability) (92). As a result of their limited aqueous solubility, their concentration remains relatively low in stomach and intestine fluids following administration. As a result, even though intestinal permeability is great, the amount of medicine absorbed remains modest (92).

Morozkina et al. (26) were successful in implementing a novel mechanochemistry strategy for improving ketoprofen solubility and efficacy. The methodology’s advantages include a reduction in ulcerogenic effects and an improvement in medication absorption and efficacy.

The development of nanocrystalline naproxen (93) is another example of improving solubility and thus bioavailability. Non-steroidal inflammation, swelling, stiffness, and joint pain are among the symptoms of arthritis that are frequently treated with anti-inflammatory medications like naproxen. Two commercially available medications, namely, naprosyn (suspension) and anaprox, were compared to the bioavailability of nanocrystalline naproxen (tablet). According to the findings of a human pharmacokinetic investigation, nanocrystalline dispersion takes about half the time to attain maximal drug concentrations (94).

The field of pharmaceutical materials science uses modern mechanochemistry to a significant extent. The use of neat grinding, liquid-assisted grinding (LAGs), and polymer-assisted grinding (POLAGs) in screening for API polymorphs, solvates, salts, and cocrystals have been extensively investigated (95). As a recent extension of this, mechanochemistry is applied to utilize API molecules themselves, which has given rise to a branch of mechanochemistry called “medicinal mechanochemistry,” which strives to produce cleaner, more efficient, and solvent-free alternatives to the solutions-based procedures traditionally used in medicine and pharmacology (53).

The solubility of pure components in classic solvent-based procedures can be a major challenge to cocrystals. In an already complex multicomponent system, the solvent adds more degrees of freedom to the crystallization process. The crystallization of a pure component crystalline product can be achieved with a 1:1 solution composition instead of a 1:1 cocrystal (96).

Using electrically induced techniques such as microwave-enhanced crystallization, ultrasound-assisted procedures, high shear granulation, neat grinding, cry milling, thermal methods, and hot-melt extrusion crystallization, resonant acoustic mixing, and song crystallization yield high-efficiency results (97). It has been discovered that mechanical processes like simple grinding and liquid-assisted grinding have been more effective at producing cocrystals of NSAIDs, as shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2
www.bohrpub.com

Table 2. Preparation technique of cocrystal NSAIDs (95, 36, 53).

As automatic mills have been introduced that control the frequency of milling and energy application during milling, these methods have overcome their limitations on practicality and reproducibility. Extrusion of hot-melt materials is an emerging manufacturing technology (71).

5. Conclusion

An overview of current developments in the utilization of mechanochemical methods for the synthesis of pharmaceutical compounds and materials is provided in the following article, with a number of instances of chemical reactions that explain how drugs are transformed using mechanochemistry and mechanistic studies that demonstrate how molecular products are synthesized that are elusive using conventional solution techniques. NSAIDs’ mechanochemical role has the following main advantages: enhanced bioavailability and the potential to alter dissolution rates. In addition to facilitating the transformation of drugs from liquid form into solid form and improved wettability.

Author contributions

MA, made contributions to the idea and design of the study, the collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of the manuscript, and the critical revision of the manuscript. Both authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

References

1. Andini S, Bolognese A, Formisano D, Manfra M, Montagnaro F, Santoro L. Mechanochemistry of ibuprofen pharmaceutical. Chemosphere. (2012) 88:548–53. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.025

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Buser H-R, Poiger T, Müller MD. Occurrence and fate of the pharmaceutical drug diclofenac in surface waters: Rapid photodegradation in a lake. Environ Sci Technol. (1998) 32:3449–56.

Google Scholar

3. Alrbaihat M. A review of size reduction techniques using mechanochemistry approach. Egypt J Chem. (2021) 65:551–8. doi: 10.21608/ejchem.2021.105136.4848

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Baláž P. Mechanochemistry in minerals engineering. Mechanochem Nanosci Miner Eng. (2008):257–96. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-

CrossRef Full Text | 74855-7_5Google Scholar

5. Guo X, Xiang D, Duan G, Mou P. A review of mechanochemistry applications in waste management. Waste Manag. (2010) 30:4–10.

Google Scholar

6. Friščić T, Mottillo C, Titi HM. Mechanochemistry for synthesis. Angewandte Chemie. (2020) 132:1030–41. doi: 10.1002/ange.201906755

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Al Bazedi GA, Al-Rawajfeh AE, Alrbaihat MR. Synthesis of nanomaterials by mechanochemistry. Greener Synthesis of Nanomaterials and Compounds. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc (2021). p. 405–17. doi: 10.1016/C2019-

CrossRef Full Text | 0-03121-4Google Scholar

8. Takacs L. Mechanochemistry and the other branches of chemistry?: Similarities and Di erences. Acta Phys Pol A. (2012) 121:711–4.

Google Scholar

9. Zhao X, Wei Y, Wang Z, Zhang B, Chen F, Zhang P. Mechanochemistry in thermomechanical processing of foods?: Kinetic aspects. J Food Sci. (2011) 76:R134–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02301.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Beyer MK, Clausen-Schaumann H. Mechanochemistry: The mechanical activation of covalent bonds. Chem Rev. (2005) 105:2921–48.

Google Scholar

11. Colacino E, Delogu F, Hanusa T. Advances in mechanochemistry. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. (2021) 9:10662–3. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c04390

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Baláž P, Achimovicová M, Baláž M, Billik P, Zara CZ, Criado JM, et al. Hallmarks of mechanochemistry: From nanoparticles to technology. Chem Soc Rev. (2013) 42:7571–637. doi: 10.1039/c3cs35468g

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Nasiri-tabrizi B, Baradaran S, Zalnezhad E, Basirun WJ. Applications of electron microscopy in mechanochemistry. In: Mčndez-Vilas A editor. Miscroscopy: Advances in Scientific Research and Education (formatex). (2014). p. 791–802.

Google Scholar

14. Valery Z, Krystyna W, Nataly L, Iryna B, Laura D. Mechanochemistry in the Industrial Processes Catalysts Preparation. (2004). 6 p.

Google Scholar

15. Choi WS. Mechanochemistry in the preparation of advanced materials. Acta Montanistica Slovaca. (2006) 11 :122–9.

Google Scholar

16. Do JL, Friščić T. Mechanochemistry: A force of synthesis. ACS Central Sci. (2017) 3:13–9. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.6b00277

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Mucsi G. A review on mechanical activation and mechanical alloying in stirred media mill. Chem Eng Res Design. (2019) 148:460–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2019.06.029

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Boldyrev VV. Mechanochemistry and mechanical activation of solids. Russian Chem Rev. (2006) 75:177–89. doi: 10.1070/rc2006v075n03abeh001205

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Suryanarayana C. Mechanical alloying and milling. Progr Mater Sci. (2001) 46:1–184. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6425(99)00010-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. AlShamaileh E, Al-Rawajfeh AE, Alrbaihat M. Mechanochemical synthesis of slow-release fertilizers: A review. Open Agric J. (2018) 12:11–9. doi: 10.2174/1874331501812010011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Baláž P. Applied mechanochemistry. Mechanochem Nanosci Miner Eng. (2008):297–405. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-74855-7_6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Borges R, Prevot V, Forano C, Wypych F. Design and kinetic study of sustainable potential slow-release fertilizer obtained by mechanochemical activation of clay minerals and potassium monohydrogen phosphate. Industr Eng Chem Res. (2017) 56:708–16. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b04378

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Mikhak A, Sohrabi A, Kassaee MZ, Feizian M. Synthetic nanozeolite/nanohydroxyapatite as a phosphorus fertilizer for German chamomile (Matricariachamomilla?L.). Industr Crops Prod. (2017) 95:444–52. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.10.054

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Chow EHH, Strobridge FC, Friščić T. Mechanochemistry of magnesium oxide revisited: Facile derivatisation of pharmaceuticals using coordination and supramolecular chemistry. Chem Commun. (2010) 46:6368–70.

Google Scholar

25. Hasa D, Jones W. Screening for new pharmaceutical solid forms using mechanochemistry: A practical guide. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. (2017) 117:147–61. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.05.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Morozkina S, Uspenskaya M, Tyanutova M, Zolotukhina T. Mechanochemistry approaches for ketoprofen efficacy improvement. Int Multidiscip Sci Geoconf. (2019) 19:791–6.

Google Scholar

27. Quaresma S, Andrč V, Fernandes A, Duarte MT. Mechanochemistry–A green synthetic methodology leading to metallodrugs, metallopharmaceuticals and bio-inspired metal-organic frameworks. Inorganica Chim Acta. (2017) 455:309–18.

Google Scholar

28. Ying P, Yu J, Su W. Liquid-assisted grinding mechanochemistry in the synthesis of pharmaceuticals. Adv Synth Catal. (2021) 363:1246–71.

Google Scholar

29. Aleksandrov AI, Shevchenko VG, Tarasenkov AN, Surin NM, Cherkaev GV, Metlenkova IY, et al. Mechanochemical synthesis and structure of a nanocluster {organosilicon dendrimer - Copper dimer}. J Organometallic Chem. (2021) 950:121976. doi: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2021.121976

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Chauhan A, Svenson S, Reyna L, Tomalia D. Solubility enhancement propensity of PAMAM nanoconstructs. Mater Matters Nanomater. (2007) 2:24–6.

Google Scholar

31. Michael P, Binder WH. A mechanochemically triggered “click” catalyst. Angewandte Chem. (2015) 127:14124–8.

Google Scholar

32. Robb MJ, Moore JS. A retro-staudinger cycloaddition: Mechanochemical cycloelimination of a β-lactam mechanophore. J Am Chem Soc. (2015) 137:10946–9.

Google Scholar

33. Al-Rawajfeh AE, AlShamaileh EM, Alrbaihat MR. Clean and efficient synthesis using mechanochemistry: Preparation of kaolinite–KH 2 PO 4 and kaolinite–(NH 4) 2 HPO 4 complexes as slow released fertilizer. J Industr Eng Chem. (2019) 73:336–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.01.046

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Alrbaihat MR, Al-rawajfeh AE, Alshamaileh E. A mechanochemical preparation, properties and kinetic study of kaolin – N, P fertilizers for agricultural applications **. J Mech Behav Mater. (2021) 30:265–71. doi: 10.1515/jmbm-2021-0028

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Said A, Zhang Q, Qu J, Liu Y, Lei Z, Hu H, et al. Mechanochemical activation of phlogopite to directly produce slow-release potassium fertilizer. Appl Clay Sci. (2018) 165:77–81. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2018.08.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Friščić T. New opportunities for materials synthesis using mechanochemistry. J Mater Chem. (2010) 20:7599–605. doi: 10.1039/c0jm00872a

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Takacs L. The historical development of mechanochemistry. Chem Soc Rev. (2013) 42:7649–59. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35442j

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Wang G-W. Mechanochemical organic synthesis. Chem Soc Rev. (2013) 42:7668–700.

Google Scholar

39. Khot LR, Sankaran S, Maja JM, Ehsani R, Schuster EW. Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production and crop protection: A review. Crop Protect. (2012) 35:64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2012.01.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Mahmoud AED, Franke M, Stelter M, Braeutigam P. Mechanochemical versus chemical routes for graphitic precursors and their performance in micropollutants removal in water. Powder Technol. (2020) 366:629–40. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.02.073

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Yang G, Zhu C, Du D, Zhu J, Lin Y. Graphene-like two-dimensional layered nanomaterials: Applications in biosensors and nanomedicine. Nanoscale. (2015) 7:14217–31. doi: 10.1039/c5nr03398e

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Chavan RB, Yadav B, Lodagekar A, Shastri NR. Multicomponent solid forms: a new boost to pharmaceuticals. Multifunctional Nanocarriers for Contemporary Healthcare Applications. Pennsylvania: IGI Global (2018). p. 273–300.

Google Scholar

43. Cheng J, Deming TJ. Synthesis of polypeptides by ROP of NCAs. In. Deming T editor. Peptide-Based Materials. (2011) Vol. 310, p. 1–26. doi: 10.1007/128_2011_173

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Collins DS, Kourtis LC, Thyagarajapuram NR, Sirkar R, Kapur S, Harrison MW, et al. Optimizing the bioavailability of subcutaneously administered biotherapeutics through mechanochemical drivers. Pharm Res. (2017) 34:2000–11.

Google Scholar

45. McCormick PG, Froes FH. The fundamentals of mechanochemical processing. JOM. (1998) 50:61–5. doi: 10.1007/s11837-998-0290-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Wang Z, Ma Z, Wang Y, Xu Z, Luo Y, Wei Y, et al. A novel mechanochromic and photochromic polymer film: When rhodamine joins polyurethane. Adv Mater. (2015) 27:6469–74.

Google Scholar

47. Zhang Q, Saito F. A review on mechanochemical syntheses of functional materials. Adv Powder Technol. (2012) 23:523–31. doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2012.05.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Kang HJ, Choi YH, Joo IW, Lee JE. Mechanochemical synthesis of CD-MOFs and application as a cosmetic ingredient. Bull Korean Chem Soc. (2021) 42:737–9.

Google Scholar

49. Gazzurelli C, Migliori A, Mazzeo PP, Carcelli M, Pietarinen S, Leonardi G, et al. Making agriculture more sustainable: An environmentally friendly approach to the synthesis of Lignin@ Cu pesticides. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. (2020) 8:14886–95.

Google Scholar

50. González VJ, Vázquez E, Villajos B, Tolosana-Moranchel A, Duran-Valle C, Faraldos M, et al. Eco-friendly mechanochemical synthesis of titania-graphene nanocomposites for pesticide photodegradation. Separation Purification Technol. (2022) 289:120638.

Google Scholar

51. Yan H, Chen X, Wu T, Feng Y, Wang C, Li J, et al. Mechanochemical modification of kaolin surfaces for immobilization and delivery of pesticides in alginate- chitosan composite beads. Polymer Bull. (2014) 71:2923–44.

Google Scholar

52. Dushkin AV. Mechanochemical synthesis of organic compounds and rapidly soluble materials. High-energy Ball Milling. Amsterdam: Elsevier (2010). p. 224–47.

Google Scholar

53. Tan D, Friščić T. Mechanochemistry for organic chemists: An update. Eur J Organ Chem. (2018) 2018:18–33.

Google Scholar

54. Colombo I, Grassi G, Grassi M. Drug mechanochemical activation. J Pharm Sci. (2009) 98:3961–86.

Google Scholar

55. Shi Z, Wu J, Song Q, Göstl R, Herrmann A. Toward drug release using polymer mechanochemical disulfide scission. J Am Chem Soc. (2020) 142:14725–32.

Google Scholar

56. Akpor OB, Muchie M. Remediation of heavy metals in drinking water and wastewater treatment systems: Processes and applications. Int J Phys Sci. (2010) 5:1807–17.

Google Scholar

57. Lomovsky O, Korolyov K, Kwon YS. Mechanochemical solubilization and mechanochemically assisted extraction of plant bioactive substances. Proceedings of the 7th Korea-Russia International Symposium on Science and Technology, Proceedings KORUS 2003.(IEEE Cat. No. 03EX737), Ulsan (2003) 1:7–20.

Google Scholar

58. Lomovsky OI, Lomovskiy IO, Orlov DV. Mechanochemical solid acid/base reactions for obtaining biologically active preparations and extracting plant materials. Green Chem Lett Rev. (2017) 10:171–85.

Google Scholar

59. Wang S, Zhang R, Song X, Wei M, Xie T, Cao J. Mechanochemical-assisted extraction of active alkaloids from plant with solid acids. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. (2018) 7:197–207.

Google Scholar

60. Wu K, Ju T, Deng Y, Xi J. Mechanochemical assisted extraction: A novel, efficient, eco-friendly technology. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2017) 66:166–75.

Google Scholar

61. Ren Y, Mei L, Zhou L, Guo G. Recent perspectives in hot melt extrusion-based polymeric formulations for drug delivery: Applications and innovations. Aaps Pharm Sci Tech. (2019) 20:1–12.

Google Scholar

62. Tan et al. (2018)

Google Scholar

63. Horton AA, Dixon SJ. Microplastics: An introduction to environmental transport processes. WIREs Water. (2018) 5:e1268. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1268

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. James SL, Adams CJ, Bolm C, Braga D, Collier P, Friščić T, et al. Mechanochemistry: New and cleaner synthesis Author list, addresses and affiliations. Chem Soc Rev. (2012) 44:0–78.

Google Scholar

65. Sandström Å. Mechanochemical treatment in metallurgy?: An metal recovery from primary resources. Division of Minerals and Metallurgical Engineering, Dm. (2016).

Google Scholar

66. Garay AL, Pichon A, James SL. Solvent-free synthesis of metal complexes. Chem Soc Rev. (2007) 36:846–55.

Google Scholar

67. Madzokere TC, Murombo LT, Chiririwa H. Nano-based slow releasing fertilizers for enhanced agricultural productivity. Mater Today Proc. (2020) 45:3709–15. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.674

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Adams CJ, Lusi M, Mutambi EM, Orpen AG. Two-step mechanochemical synthesis of carbene complexes of palladium (II) and platinum (II). Crystal Growth Design. (2017) 17:3151–5.

Google Scholar

69. Allenbaugh RJ, Zachary JR, Underwood AN, Bryson JD, Williams JR, Shaw A. Kinetic analysis of the complete mechanochemical synthesis of a palladium (II) carbene complex. Inorganic Chem Commun. (2020) 111:107622.

Google Scholar

70. Andersen J, Mack J. Mechanochemistry and organic synthesis: From mystical to practical. Green Chem. (2018) 20:1435–43.

Google Scholar

71. Leonardi M, Villacampa M, Menčndez JC. Multicomponent mechanochemical synthesis. Chem Sci. (2018) 9:2042–64.

Google Scholar

72. Beillard A, Mčtro TX, Bantreil X, Martinez J, Lamaty F. Cu(0), O2 and mechanical forces: A saving combination for efficient production of Cu-NHC complexes. Chem Sci. (2017) 8:1086–9. doi: 10.1039/C6SC03182J

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Solares-Briones M, Coyote-Dotor G, Páez-Franco JC, Zermeño-Ortega MR, de la O Contreras CM, Canseco-González D, et al. Mechanochemistry: A green approach in the preparation of pharmaceutical cocrystals. Pharmaceutics. (2021) 13:1–49. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13060790

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Mottillo C, Friščić T. Advances in solid-state transformations of coordination bonds: From the ball mill to the aging chamber. Molecules. (2017) 22:144.

Google Scholar

75. Akbulatov S, Boulatov R. Experimental polymer mechanochemistry and its interpretational frameworks. Chem Phys Chem. (2017) 18:1422–50.

Google Scholar

76. Willis-Fox N, Rognin E, Aljohani TA, Daly R. Polymer mechanochemistry: Manufacturing is now a force to be reckoned with. Chem. (2018) 4:2499–537.

Google Scholar

77. Rai M, Ribeiro C, Mattoso L, Duran N. Nanotechnologies in food and agriculture. Nanotechnol Food Agric. (2015):1–347. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-

CrossRef Full Text | 14024-7Google Scholar

78. Thompson LA, Darwish WS. Environmental chemical contaminants in food: Review of a global problem. J Toxicol. (2019) 2019:2345283. doi: 10.1155/2019/2345283

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Braga D, Maini L, Grepioni F. Mechanochemical preparation of co-crystals. Chem Soc Rev. (2013) 42:7638–48.

Google Scholar

80. Zhu S-E, Li F, Wang G-W. Mechanochemistry of fullerenes and related materials. Chem Soc Rev. (2013) 42:7535–70.

Google Scholar

81. Tan D, Loots L, Friščić T. Towards medicinal mechanochemistry: Evolution of milling from pharmaceutical solid form screening to the synthesis of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). Chem Commun. (2016) 52:7760–81. doi: 10.1039/c6cc02015a

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Bučar D, Elliott JA, Eddleston MD, Cockcroft JK, Jones W. Sonocrystallization yields monoclinic paracetamol with significantly improved compaction behavior. Angewandte Chem. (2015) 54:249–53.

Google Scholar

83. Stoler E, Warner JC. Non-covalent derivatives: Cocrystals and eutectics. Molecules. (2015) 20:14833–48.

Google Scholar

84. Nangare S, Vispute Y, Tade R, Dugam S, Patil P. Pharmaceutical applications of citric acid. Fut J Pharm Sci. (2021) 7:1–23.

Google Scholar

85. Douroumis D, Ross SA, Nokhodchi A. Advanced methodologies for cocrystal synthesis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. (2017) 117:178–95.

Google Scholar

86. Datta S, Grant DJW. Crystal structures of drugs: Advances in determination, prediction and engineering. Nat Rev Drug Discov. (2004) 3:42–57. doi: 10.1038/nrd1280

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Leistenschneider D, Zürbes K, Schneidermann C, Grätz S, Oswald S, Wegner K, et al. Mechanochemical functionalization of carbon black at room temperature. C. (2018) 4:14.

Google Scholar

88. Mohammadinejad R, Mansoori GA. Large-scale production/biosynthesis of biogenic nanoparticles. In: Ghorbanpour M, Bhargava P, Varma A, Choudhary D editors. Biogenic Nano-Particles and their Use in Agro-ecosystems. Singapore: Springer (2020). doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-2985-6_5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Pčrez-Alzate D, Cornejo-García JA, Pčrez-Sánchez N, Andreu I, García-Moral A, Agúndez JA, et al. Immediate reactions to more than 1 NSAID Must not be considered cross-hypersensitivity unless tolerance to ASA is verified. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. (2017) 27:32–9.

Google Scholar

90. Szabó-Rčvčsz P. Modifying the physicochemical properties of NSAIDs for nasal and pulmonary administration. Drug Discov Today Technol. (2018) 27:87–93.

Google Scholar

91. Badri W, Miladi K, Nazari QA, Greige-Gerges H, Fessi H, Elaissari A. Encapsulation of NSAIDs for inflammation management: Overview, progress, challenges and prospects. Int J Pharm. (2016) 515:757–73.

Google Scholar

92. Rawat T, Pandey IP. Forced degradation studies for drug substances and drug products-scientific and regulatory considerations. J Pharm Sci Res. (2015) 7:238.

Google Scholar

93. Merisko-Liversidge E, Liversidge GG, Cooper ER. Nanosizing: A formulation approach for poorly-water-soluble compounds. Eur J Pharm Sci. (2003) 18:113–20.

Google Scholar

94. Szabados M, Gácsi A, Gulyás Y, Kónya Z, Kukovecz Á, Csányi E, et al. Conventional or mechanochemically-aided intercalation of diclofenac and naproxen anions into the interlamellar space of CaFe-layered double hydroxides and their application as dermal drug delivery systems. Appl Clay Sci. (2021) 212:106233.

Google Scholar

95. Delori A, Frišić T, Jones W. The role of mechanochemistry and supramolecular design in the development of pharmaceutical materials. Cryst Eng Comm. (2012) 14:2350–62. doi: 10.1039/c2ce06582g

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Leyssens T, ter Horst JH. Solution co-crystallisation and its applications. In: Tiekink ERT, Zukerman-Schpector J editors. Multi-Component Crystals: Synthesis, Concepts, Function. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH (2017). p. 205–36.

Google Scholar

97. Shaikh R, Singh R, Walker GM, Croker DM. Pharmaceutical cocrystal drug products: An outlook on product development. Trends Pharmacol Sci. (2018) 39:1033–48.

Google Scholar

98. Zhang Q, Polyakov NE, Chistyachenko YS, Khvostov MV, Frolova TS, Tolstikova TG, et al. Preparation of curcumin self-micelle solid dispersion with enhanced bioavailability and cytotoxic activity by mechanochemistry. Drug Deliv. (2018) 25:198–209.

Google Scholar

99. Saikia B, Seidel-Morgenstern A, Lorenz H. Role of mechanochemistry in solid form selection and identification of the drug praziquantel. Crystal Growth Design. (2021) 21:5854–61.

Google Scholar

100. de Almeida AC, Torquetti C, Ferreira PO, Fernandes RP, dos Santos EC, Kogawa AC, et al. Cocrystals of ciprofloxacin with nicotinic and isonicotinic acids: Mechanochemical synthesis, characterization, thermal and solubility study. Thermochim Acta. (2020) 685:178346.

Google Scholar

101. Haneef J, Chadha R. Sustainable synthesis of ambrisentan–syringic acid cocrystal: Employing mechanochemistry in the development of novel pharmaceutical solid form. Cryst Eng Comm. (2020) 22:2507–16.

Google Scholar

102. Xu W, Wen M, Yu J, Zhang Q, Polyakov NE, Dushkin AV, et al. Mechanochemical preparation of kaempferol intermolecular complexes for enhancing the solubility and bioavailability. Drug Dev Industr Pharm. (2018) 44:1924–32.

Google Scholar

103. Xu W, Wen M, Su W, Dushkin AV, Suntsova LP, Markova ID, et al. Physicochemical and toxic properties of novel genipin drug delivery systems prepared by mechanochemistry. Curr Drug Deliv. (2018) 15:727–36.

Google Scholar

104. Okazaki F, Hattori Y, Sasaki T, Otsuka M. Mechanochemical effect on controlled drug release of konjac glucomannan matrix tablets during dry grinding. Gels. (2022) 8:181.

Google Scholar

105. Michalchuk AAL, Tumanov IA, Boldyreva EV. The effect of ball mass on the mechanochemical transformation of a single-component organic system: Anhydrous caffeine. J Mater Sci. (2018) 53:13380–9.

Google Scholar

106. Dengale SJ, Grohganz H, Rades T, Löbmann K. Recent advances in co-amorphous drug formulations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. (2016) 100:116–25.

Google Scholar

107. Wang L, Solin N. Preparation of functionalized protein materials assisted by mechanochemistry. J Mater Sci. (2018) 53:13719–32.

Google Scholar

108. Focsan AL, Polyakov NE, Kispert LD. Supramolecular carotenoid complexes of enhanced solubility and stability—The way of bioavailability improvement. Molecules. (2019) 24:3947.

Google Scholar

109. Sharanyakanth PS, Radhakrishnan M. Synthesis of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and its application in food packaging: A critical review. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2020) 104:102–16.

Google Scholar

110. Bose A, Mal P. Mechanochemistry? of supramolecules. Beilstein J Organ Chem. (2019) 15:881–900.

Google Scholar

111. Hu X, McFadden ME, Barber RW, Robb MJ. Mechanochemical regulation of a photochemical reaction [Rapid-communication]. J Am Chem Soc. (2018) 140:14073–7. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b09628

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Klein IM, Husic CC, Kovács DP, Choquette NJ, Robb MJ. Validation of the CoGEF method as a predictive tool for polymer mechanochemistry. J Am Chem Soc. (2020) 142:16364–81. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c06868

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Sahnoun K, Bouaziz J. Mechanochemical synthesis of kaolin-potassium phosphates complexes for application as slow-release fertilizer. Mediterranean J Chem. (2015) 4:156–62.

Google Scholar

114. Noh J, Peterson GI, Choi TL. Mechanochemical reactivity of bottlebrush and dendronized polymers: Solid vs. solution states. Angewandte Chem. (2021) 60:18651–9. doi: 10.1002/anie.202104447

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar