<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Bohr. Gim.</journal-id>
<journal-title>BOHR International Journal of General and Internal Medicine</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Bohr. Gim.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2583-6730</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>BOHR</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.54646/bijgim.2023.20</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>The impact of healthcare service quality dimensions on patient satisfaction: a case study of Ganta United Methodist Hospital, Liberia</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Younquoi</surname> <given-names>Cyrus</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Jalloh</surname> <given-names>Abdulai</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Onyibe</surname> <given-names>Precillia</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Nwosu</surname> <given-names>Laurine</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Faculty of Health Sciences, Healthcare Organizations Management, Cyprus International University</institution>, <addr-line>Nicosia</addr-line>, <country>Cyprus</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Business Administration, Cyprus International University</institution>, <addr-line>Nicosia</addr-line>, <country>Cyprus</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Abdulai Jalloh, <email>jayjalloh33@gmail.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>18</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>2</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>67</fpage>
<lpage>73</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>16</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>21</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2023 Younquoi, Jalloh, Onyibe and Nwosu.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Younquoi, Jalloh, Onyibe and Nwosu</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Patient satisfaction is an important measure of healthcare service quality and influences the overall effectiveness of healthcare systems. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between various dimensions of healthcare service quality and patient satisfaction. The dimensions include Tangibility, Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, and Empathy. A convenient sampling technique was employed. Data were collected via questionnaire distribution to people who have received services at the Ganta United Methodist Hospital. A total of 384 questionnaires were distributed. However, due to missing information, 381 valid responses were employed for analysis using the Statistical Program for Social Sciences (SPSS) software. Factor analysis was conducted for testing validity and reliability was carried out on the valid items to generate Cronbach&#x2019;s alpha values. Correlation and regression analysis were conducted on the constructs of interest. The findings revealed a satisfaction level below average among respondents. A positive association and a significant impact of the service quality dimensions on patient satisfaction were also revealed. It is recommended that the hospital management implement strategies to enhance these dimensions and patient overall satisfaction, which include providing training for all members of staff on communication skills, providing an environment that is easily assessable, and paying keen attention to patient feedback to create room for continuous improvement.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>healthcare quality</kwd>
<kwd>patient satisfaction</kwd>
<kwd>quality improvement</kwd>
<kwd>service delivery</kwd>
<kwd>service quality dimensions</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="1"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="37"/>
<page-count count="7"/>
<word-count count="4427"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="S1" sec-type="intro">
<title>1. Introduction</title>
<p>In the area of healthcare, the pursuit of offering quality healthcare extends beyond basic medical procedures to include the dimensions of service quality. Patient satisfaction is a significant metric of the overall efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare services (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>). As healthcare systems strive to improve patient-centered care and improve service standards, the measurement of patient satisfaction with healthcare service quality dimensions arises as a relevant topic of study. Healthcare service quality dimensions is defined as the different aspects that collectively contribute to patient&#x2019;s perception of the quality of care received. These dimensions include tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy. Reliability is the capability to perform the service reliably and correctly. The reliability of a firm relates to how well it performs and completes its promised service, quality, and accuracy within the limits agreed upon between the hospital and the customer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>). It is defined as the ability to consistently and precisely deliver promised services, i.e., when something is promised, it is delivered, and services are delivered on time, such as appointments, registration, and problem solutions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>). Gachau (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>) conducted a study that investigated customer satisfaction and insurance service delivery quality in Kenya and discovered that insurance customers derive complete satisfaction from good treatment and prompt and accurate service from employees and agents, which leads to them purchasing more products from the same insurer and recommending the insurance company to family and friends. According to the study, clients value insurer flexibility and speed, both of which are markers of service reliability (timeliness in service delivery). Zygiaris et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>) conducted a study of the effect of service quality on customer satisfaction in selected insurance businesses in Addis Abeba and discovered a significant gap in service reliability, which was deemed to be insufficient, resulting in customer dissatisfaction. The staff and insurance agent made promises to customers that they could not keep, which led to low levels of customer satisfaction. Nguyen et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>) investigated the elements that influence customer satisfaction in the Iranian insurance business. The study also discovered gaps in service reliability, such as when service providers did not provide services on time, and hence were not reliable, causing customer dissatisfaction.</p>
<p>Assurance is the aspect of trust and confidence that patients perceive while engaging with healthcare providers and the entire healthcare system. Assurance is the capacity to instill trust and confidence in people. It also refers to the courtesy that healthcare staff must offer to their patients. It involves employees&#x2019; skills and capabilities, as well as whether these skills and capabilities earn the customers&#x2019; trust and confidence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>). If patients feel at ease with the staff, it is likely that they will return to the hospital. Competence, courtesy, excellent communication, and an overall attitude that serves patients successfully and efficiently are characteristics of assurance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>). Customers have faith in the hospital because of the behavior of the employees who are respectful and always have the requisite knowledge to address client questions. Previous studies on patient satisfaction in the healthcare sector have also discovered a link between service quality and satisfaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>). Darrmawan et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>) for example, reveal that empathy and assurance dimensions, which mostly represent word-of-mouth communication, have a considerable influence on patients&#x2019; willingness to return to the hospital. Another study, which examined the dimensionality of the SERVQUAL instrument in the Northern Cyprus healthcare system, found that assurance had some influence on patient satisfaction in public hospitals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>).</p>
<p>Tangibility encompasses a wide range of concepts, including physical buildings, equipment, and the outward look of individuals. Tangibles are characteristics of a service that can be &#x2018;felt&#x2019; without actually paying for it. Tangibles are the &#x2018;visible&#x2019; characteristics of a service that firms use to promote external client satisfaction. In other words, it refers to the physical attributes of employees, facilities, equipment, hospital surroundings, visitor seating, bathroom cleanliness, patient room cleanliness, and overall tangible infrastructure attractiveness that were drawn to get more patients, implying that patient attraction will be easily produced if the hospital is improved, but if the hospital is not attractive, it cannot attract or retain patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>). A study by Manzoor et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>) discovered that medical facilities have a significant influence on patient satisfaction. They go on to say that hygienic conditions, a healthy interior atmosphere for patients, natural light arrangements, a peaceful environment of the wards, clean wards, and adequate bed positioning are all vital ambient items in any hospital. If these items are well organized, they will influence 60 percent of the patients to return for treatment.</p>
<p>Empathy may be defined as the degree of sympathy and special care that is shown toward patients. Empathy is a means for hospital professionals to prioritize patients&#x2019; needs. The most important factor was to get the patient&#x2019;s attention, which contributed to the patient&#x2019;s satisfaction. It comprises consumer access, communication, and understanding their needs. Patients today have higher expectations of service providers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>). Good communication between health-care practitioners and patients frequently results in easy comprehension and attention from the patient. Humanism in healthcare is advanced by expressing patient empathy. In reality, demonstrating empathy in healthcare is a critical component of improving the patient experience and patient interaction. In healthcare, empathy plays an important part in the patient experience and is an important component of the physician-patient relationship (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>). When a patient arrives at their healthcare provider&#x2019;s office, their medical condition, whether it is a severe sickness or accident, a chronic condition, or simply a normal check-up, may frequently express feelings such as anxiety, fear, and nervousness. Empathy is a highly effective and strong tool for increasing patient trust, calming anxiety, and improving health results. Research has shown that empathy has been linked to greater drug adherence, fewer malpractice charges, fewer errors, and more patient satisfaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>).</p>
<p>Responsiveness is the ability to respond in a timely way to the requirements of one&#x2019;s customers while also exhibiting a desire to serve those customers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>). The eagerness to assist clients and offer prompt service is referred to as responsiveness. This component is concerned with paying attention to patients, responding to questions, and resolving problems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>). The responsiveness of the system is a key component of patients&#x2019; overall experience when receiving medical care (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>). If a service is not provided, the capacity to recover promptly and competently can result in highly positive evaluations of quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>). As a result, people are dissatisfied after having to wait for a lengthy time for a prescription, consultation, or treatment. Patients comprehend and evaluate the many facets of their experiences while in a healthcare facility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>). Successes in patient responsiveness can have a direct impact on patient well-being. If the patient&#x2019;s experience with services falls short of his or her expectations, the patient will be unsatisfied (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>). Unmet expectations, in other words, may contribute to dissatisfaction, which may lead to poor compliance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>). However, if the services received meet the patient&#x2019;s expectations, he or she will be satisfied (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>). Based on the foregoing, it is predicted that meeting patients&#x2019; realistic expectations (responsiveness) will result in their satisfaction.</p>
<p>The evaluation of these dimensions has the potential to reveal areas for improvement within healthcare systems, hence leading strategic activities targeted at increasing patient satisfaction and improving the overall care experience.</p>
<p>In recent years, there has been a shift in the healthcare landscape toward patient-centered care models, in which patients are regarded as active participants in their healthcare journeys rather than passive users of services (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>). This shift underscores the need for understanding patient viewpoints and implementing their suggestions in the enhancement of healthcare service delivery and as such, assessing the satisfaction of patients has grown in significance not just as a performance indicator but also as a driver of favorable health outcomes. The study aims to evaluate the satisfaction level of patients who have visited Ganta United Methodist Hospital based on the service quality dimensions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2">
<title>2. Methodology</title>
<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref> below shows the proposed model of different service dimensions that have an effect on patient satisfaction.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Research model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="bijgim-2023-20-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<sec id="S2.SS1">
<title>2.1. Sample and procedure</title>
<p>In this cross-sectional study, data were collected from people who have previously been treated at Ganta United Methodist Hospital. Before filling the questionnaire, full consent was obtained from each participant after the objectives of the study were stated. The selection of respondents was conducted via the convenience sampling technique. Convenience sampling is a non-probabilistic sampling technique in which respondents who are easily accessible to the researcher are selected. The sample size was obtained using the statistical formula <italic>n</italic> = Z<sup>2</sup> (pq)/e<sup>2</sup>, which is used to estimate the sample size for an unknown population (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>). The sample size after calculation resulted in 384. After distributing to participants, all questionnaires were returned. However, 3 questionnaires were removed due to missing information in them. From the descriptive analysis presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>, most respondents (55.6%) were in the age range 26&#x2013;35 years, while the least number (6.0%) were 46 years and above. There was a significant difference in the number of males and females, as 15.2% was for the former and 84.8% for the latter. Most of the participants (55.9%) acquired education up to primary/secondary level and the least (2.4%) obtained graduate education.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>Demographic characteristics of surveyed patients (<italic>n</italic> = 381).</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Variables</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>N</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(%)</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Age</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">20&#x2013;25 years</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">26&#x2013;35 years</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">212</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">55.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">36&#x2013;45 years</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">116</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">46 and above</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Gender</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Female</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">323</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">84.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Male</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Educational level</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">None</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Primary/secondary</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">213</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">55.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Diploma</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">First degree</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Masters/PhD</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.4</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2">
<title>2.2. Measures</title>
<p>The administered questionnaire had 2 sections. The first was centered on the demographic information of the participants. The second category measured the main constructs (Service quality dimensions and patient satisfaction). The items were adopted from research by Parasuraman et al. (1988) with responses utilizing a 5-pont Likert Scale (&#x201C;Strongly disagree&#x201D;&#x2013;&#x201C;Strongly agree&#x201D;).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS3">
<title>2.3. Data analysis</title>
<p>Statistical analysis was carried out using the SPSS program. A validity test was carried out using factor analysis, which is widely known to be one of the most effective techniques for construct validity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>). A reliability test of the valid items was conducted to obtain Cronbach&#x2019;s alpha (&#x03B1;) values which are used to determine internal consistency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>). A rule of thumb is that a coefficient &#x2265; 0.6 is deemed suitable (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>). For the correlation analysis, the constructs were tested and coefficients generated using the Pearson Correlation test was used to determine the strength and direction of the examined associations. A regression analysis was then performed to determine the presence of a significant direct effect between the predictor and outcome variables.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S3" sec-type="results">
<title>3. Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS1">
<title>3.1. Descriptive analysis</title>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref> reveals the mean and standard deviation of the different items as filled by the respondents. Since a 5-point Likert scale was employed, a median value of 3.0 was employed as a benchmark. Thus, values below 3.0 imply a dissatisfaction regarding the item and those from 3.0 and above imply satisfaction. The responses obtained revealed a general dissatisfaction with the service quality dimensions.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>Descriptive analysis.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Mean</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Std. deviation</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Tangibility</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.883</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.804</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.82</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.840</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.161</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Reliability</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">R1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.004</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">R2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.81</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.750</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">R3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.873</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">R4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.89</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.987</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">R5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.811</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Responsiveness</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">RE 1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.828</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">RE 2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.884</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">RE 3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.923</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">RE 4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.925</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Assurance</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">A1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.939</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">A2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.017</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">A3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.099</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">A4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.972</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Empathy</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">E1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.139</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">E2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.060</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">E3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.030</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">E4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">E5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.94</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.907</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Patient satisfaction</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PS1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.905</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PS2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.965</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PS3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.912</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PS4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.002</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS2">
<title>3.2. Reliability and validity analysis</title>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref> shows the validity and Cronbach&#x2019;s alpha values of the items. Values from 0.5 and above were considered a significant factor loading as suggested by Gupta and Falk (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>). All items were above the threshold and a reliability test was conducted.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption><p>Validity and reliability.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Variable</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Indicator</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Factor loadings</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Cronbach&#x2019;s&#x03B1;</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tangibility</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">T 1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.576</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.791</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">T 2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.635</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">T 3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.891</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">T 4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.624</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Reliability</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">R 1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.732</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.864</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">R 2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.711</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">R 3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.516</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">R 4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.721</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">R 5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.665</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Responsiveness</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">RE 1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.865</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.748</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">RE 2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.612</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">RE 3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.714</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">RE 4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.729</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Assurance</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">A 1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.737</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.894</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">A 2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.702</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">A 3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.811</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">A 4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.762</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">A 5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.698</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Empathy</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">E 1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.770</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.893</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">E 2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.682</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">E 3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.787</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">E 4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.773</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">E 5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.783</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Patient satisfaction</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">PS 1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.696</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.849</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">PS 2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.783</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">PS 3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.891</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">PS 4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.771</td>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS3">
<title>3.3. Correlation analysis</title>
<p>The analysis represented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref> revealed a significant and positive association between the constructs. The findings met the criteria for conducting the regression analysis.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption><p>Correlation analysis.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Constructs</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Patient satisfaction (1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tangibility (2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.260<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fns2">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Reliability (3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.283<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fns2">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.768<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fns2">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Responsiveness (4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.378<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fns2">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.305<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fns2">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.376<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fns2">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Assurance (5)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.471<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fns2">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.292<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fns2">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.339<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fns2">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.770<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fns2">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Empathy (6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.586<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fns2">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.343<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fns2">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.360<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fns2">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.636<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fns2">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.799<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fns2">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="t4fns2"><p>&#x002A;&#x002A;Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS4">
<title>3.4. Hypothesis testing</title>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table 5</xref> shows a summary of the hypothesis test and the outcome after conducting a regression analysis. All service dimensions were shown to significantly influence patient satisfaction.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T5">
<label>TABLE 5</label>
<caption><p>Hypothesis summary.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Constructs</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Beta</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Decision</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tangibility-patient satisfaction</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.260</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Supported</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Reliability-patient satisfaction</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.283</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Supported</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Responsiveness-patient satisfaction</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.378</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Supported</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Assurance-patient satisfaction</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.471</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Supported</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Empathy-patient satisfaction</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.586</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Supported</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>4. Discussion</title>
<p>Healthcare professionals generally strive to satisfy their patients by treating their medical concerns. The level of patient satisfaction is a crucial indicator of how well healthcare providers are doing at addressing patients&#x2019; demands (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>). It plays a big role in determining what patients desire (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>). Our findings suggest a significant impact on reliability on patient satisfaction is in line with that of Abidova et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>). The reliability of a firm relates to how well it performs and completes its promised service, quality, and accuracy within the limits agreed upon between the hospital and the customer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>). Zygiaris et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>) conducted a study of the effect of service quality on customer satisfaction in selected insurance businesses in Addis Abeba and discovered a significant gap in service reliability, which was deemed to be insufficient, resulting in customer dissatisfaction. The staff and insurance agent made promises to customers that they could not keep, which led to low levels of customer satisfaction Responsiveness also had a positive impact on patient satisfaction. Eberle et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>) also suggest a significant relationship between responsiveness and customer satisfaction. Successes in patient responsiveness can have a direct impact on patient satisfaction. If the patient&#x2019;s experience with services falls short of his or her expectations, the patient will be unsatisfied. Unmet expectations, in other words, may contribute to dissatisfaction which may lead to poor compliance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>). However, if the services received meet the patient&#x2019;s expectations satisfcation is enhanced. Tangibility also had a positive impact on patient satisfaction, which supports the results of (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>). A study by Manzoor et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>) discovered that medical facilities have a significant influence on patient satisfaction. They go on to say that hygienic conditions, a healthy interior atmosphere for patients, natural light arrangements, a peaceful environment of the wards, clean wards, and adequate bed positioning are all vital ambient items in any hospital. If these items are well organized, they will influence 60 percent of the patients to return for treatment. In line with our expectation, empathy had a positive influence on patient satisfaction, which is in tandem with the findings of the study carried out by Hafeez and Muhammad (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>). They argue that there is a positive and significant impact of empathy on customer satisfaction, which influences customer loyalty. Humanism in healthcare is advanced by expressing patient empathy. In reality, demonstrating empathy in healthcare is a critical component of improving the patient experience and patient interaction. In healthcare, empathy plays an important part in the patient experience and is an important component of the physician&#x2013;patient relationship (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>). When a patient arrives at their healthcare provider&#x2019;s office, their medical condition, whether it is a severe sickness or accident, a chronic condition, or simply a normal check-up, may frequently express feelings such as anxiety, fear, and nervousness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>). Research has shown that empathy has been linked to greater adherence, fewer malpractice charges, fewer errors, and increased patient satisfaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>). Lastly, assurance had a significant impact on patient satisfaction which concurs with the findings of Umoke et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>). Their research revealed a strong correlation between assurance and patient satisfaction. The majority of patients were satisfied with the thoroughness of the medical examination, medication/follow-up care instructions, medical advice received, and the competency of healthcare professionals. Assurance is the capacity to instill trust and confidence in people. It also refers to the courtesy that healthcare staff must offer to their patients. It involves employees&#x2019; skills and capabilities, as well as whether these skills and capabilities earn the customers&#x2019; trust and confidence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>). If patients feel at ease with the staff, it is likely that they will return to the hospital. Competence, courtesy, excellent communication, and an overall attitude that serves patients successfully and efficiently are characteristics of assurance. Customers have faith in the hospital because of the behavior of the employees who are respectful and always have the requisite knowledge to address client questions.</p>
<sec id="S4.SS1">
<title>4.1. Limitations and future research</title>
<p>This study examines service quality broadly; a more focused evaluation of a specific department such as the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), or dental office may be conducted. A quantitative study was employed; mixed studies should be carried out in the future to give patients an in-depth opportunity to express their perceptions. Also, the study was done only in one government-run hospital; the results may not be applicable to other government hospitals. This subject requires further research.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S5" sec-type="conclusion">
<title>5. Conclusion</title>
<p>Patient satisfaction was revealed to be positively correlated with tangibility, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. According to the study, patients are less satisfied when medical professionals take too long to attend to their needs. The research provides managers and healthcare providers with valuable insight into approaches to achieving patient satisfaction. Healthcare managers who want to retain customers and achieve overall patient satisfaction should implement evidence-based strategies which include providing training for all members of staff on communication skills, providing an environment that is easily assessable, and paying keen attention to patient feedback to create room for continuous improvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S6" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Manzoor</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hussain</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asif</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shah</surname> <given-names>SIA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Patient satisfaction with health care services; an application of physician&#x2019;s behavior as a moderator.</article-title> <source><italic>Int J Environ. Res Public Health.</italic></source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>16</volume>:<issue>3318</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijerph16183318</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>BJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gardi</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Othman</surname> <given-names>BJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmed</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ismael</surname> <given-names>NB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hamza</surname> <given-names>PA</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Hotel service quality: the impact of service quality on customer satisfaction in hospitality.</article-title> <source><italic>Int J Eng Bus Manage.</italic></source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>14</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>28</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22161/ijebm.5.3.2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Uzir</surname> <given-names>MUH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jerin</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al Halbusi</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hamid</surname> <given-names>ABA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Latiff</surname> <given-names>ASA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Does quality stimulate customer satisfaction where perceived value mediates and the usage of social media moderates?</article-title> <source><italic>Heliyon.</italic></source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>6</volume>:<issue>e05710</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05710</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gachau</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> <source>Customer Satisfaction and Insurance Service Delivery Quality in Kenya</source>. (<year>2016</year>). <fpage>57</fpage> p.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zygiaris</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hameed</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ayidh Alsubaie</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ur Rehman</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Service quality and customer satisfaction in the post pandemic world: a study of Saudi auto care industry.</article-title> <source><italic>Front Psychol.</italic></source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>13</volume>:<issue>842141</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2022.842141</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>NX</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tran</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>TA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Impact of service quality on in-patients&#x2019; satisfaction, perceived value, and customer loyalty: a mixed-methods study from a developing country.</article-title> <source><italic>Patient Preference Adh.</italic></source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>2523</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>38</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/PPA.S333586</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Agustina</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Handayani</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>HHC RSPP patient satisfaction and the impact of reliability, assurance,tangible, empathy, and responsiveness.</article-title> <source><italic>East Asian J Multidiscip Res.</italic></source> (<year>2023</year>) <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>799</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>810</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.55927/eajmr.v2i2.3032</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhuian</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> <source><italic>The Impact of Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction in Hotel Business Development.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Karlstad</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Karlstad University</publisher-name> (<year>2021</year>). p. <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>70</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jusoh</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Idris</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nor</surname> <given-names>KM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Healthcare service quality and patient satisfaction: a conceptual framework.</article-title> <source><italic>Int J Qual Reliabil Manage.</italic></source> (<year>2023</year>) <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/IJQRM-04-2022-0136</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Darrmawan</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Issalillah</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khayru</surname> <given-names>RK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Herdiyana</surname> <given-names>ARA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Putra</surname> <given-names>AR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mardikaningsih</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>BPJS patients satisfaction analysis towards service quality of public health center in Surabaya.</article-title> <source><italic>Media Kesehatan Masyarakat Indonesia.</italic></source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>124</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.30597/mkmi.v18i4.19773</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fatimah</surname> <given-names>FS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mars</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sarwadhamana</surname> <given-names>RJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mulyani</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Handayani</surname> <given-names>PD</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A comparison of patient satisfaction when using the insured and non-insured in public health center (Puskesmas Kasihan 1) Bantul, Indonesia.</article-title> <source><italic>Open Access Maced J Med Sci.</italic></source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3889/oamjms.2022.9454</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tjahjaningsih</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Widyasari</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maskur</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kusuma</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> <source><italic>The Effect of Customer Experience and Service Quality on Satisfaction in Increasing Loyalty.</italic></source> (<year>2020</year>). <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2991/aebmr.k.210311.079</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thornton</surname> <given-names>RD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nurse</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Snavely</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hackett-Zahler</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frank</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>DiTomasso</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Influences on patient satisfaction in healthcare centers: a semi-quantitative study over 5 years.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Health Serv Res.</italic></source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>17</volume>:<issue>361</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12913-017-2307-z</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moudatsou</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stavropoulou</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Philalithis</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koukouli</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The role of empathy in health and social care professionals.</article-title> <source><italic>Healthcare.</italic></source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<issue>26</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/healthcare8010026</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Balasopoulou</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>K okkinos</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pagoulatos</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Plotas</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Makri</surname> <given-names>OE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Georgakopoulos</surname> <given-names>CD</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Symposium recent advances and challenges in the management of retinoblastoma Globe - saving treatments.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Ophthal.</italic></source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>17</volume>:<issue>1</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4103/ijo.IJO</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matthews</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mokoena</surname> <given-names>BA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The influence of service quality dimensions on customer satisfaction within visa facilitation centres in South Africa.</article-title> <source><italic>Int J EBusiness EGovernment Stud.</italic></source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>112</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>25</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.34111/ijebeg.202012203</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nawaz</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pangil</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhatti</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The relationship between human resource development factors and turnover intention: a conceptual framework.</article-title> <source><italic>Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci.</italic></source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>297</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>310</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.6007/ijarbss/v5-i12/1959</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Al Ababneh</surname> <given-names>MM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Service quality in the hospitality industry.</article-title> <source><italic>J Tour Hosp.</italic></source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>6</volume>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4172/2167-0269.1000e133</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Al-Damen</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Health care service quality and its impact on patient satisfaction &#x201C;case of Al-Bashir hospital.&#x201D;.</article-title> <source><italic>Int J Bus Manage.</italic></source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<issue>136</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5539/ijbm.v12n9p136</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Silva</surname> <given-names>DS</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Moraes</surname> <given-names>GHSM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Makiya</surname> <given-names>IK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cesar</surname> <given-names>FIG</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Measurement of perceived service quality in higher education institutions.</article-title> <source><italic>Qual Assur Educ.</italic></source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>25</volume>:<fpage>415</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>39</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/QAE-10-2016-0058</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meesala</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paul</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Service quality, consumer satisfaction and loyalty in hospitals: thinking for the future.</article-title> <source><italic>J Retail Consum Serv.</italic></source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>40</volume>:<fpage>261</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.10.011</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hapsari</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clemes</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dean</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The mediating role of perceived value on the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction: evidence from indonesian airline passengers.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc Econ Fin.</italic></source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>35</volume>:<fpage>388</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>95</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00048-4</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sahoo</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghosh</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Healthscape role towards customer satisfaction in private healthcare.</article-title> <source><italic>Int J Health Care Qual Assur.</italic></source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>29</volume>:<fpage>600</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2015-0068</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Patr&#x00ED;cio</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sangiorgi</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mahr</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x010C;ai&#x0107;</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kalantari</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sundar</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Leveraging service design for healthcare transformation: toward people-centered, integrated, and technology-enabled healthcare systems.</article-title> <source><italic>J Serv Manage.</italic></source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>31</volume>:<fpage>889</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>909</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/JOSM-11-2019-0332</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cochran</surname> <given-names>WG</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Experiments for nonlinear functions (R.A. fisher memorial lecture).</article-title> <source><italic>J Am Stat Assoc.</italic></source> (<year>1973</year>) <volume>68</volume>:<fpage>771</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>81</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01621459.1973.10481423</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tavakol</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wetzel</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Factor analysis: a means for theory and instrument development in support of construct validity.</article-title> <source><italic>Int J Med Educ.</italic></source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>245</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5116/ijme.5f96.0f4a</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hajjar</surname> <given-names>ST</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Statistical analysis: internal-consistency reliability and construct validity said taan EL Hajjar Ahlia University.</article-title> <source><italic>Int J Quan Qual Res Methods.</italic></source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>27</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>38</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khidzir</surname> <given-names>KAM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ismail</surname> <given-names>NZ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abdullah</surname> <given-names>AR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Validity and river.</article-title> <source><italic>Int J Dev Sustain.</italic></source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>1026</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>37</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jalloh</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nwosu</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baysan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Evaluation of waiting times and associated factors influencing patient satisfaction levels in an outpatient department: Case study of a government hospital, Southern Sierra Leone.</article-title> <source><italic>Science, Engineering and Health Studies</italic></source> (<year>2023</year>) <fpage>23050015</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>23050015</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Falk</surname> <given-names>TH</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Latent factor analysis for synthesized speech quality-of-experience assessment.</article-title> <source><italic>Qual User Exp.</italic></source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s41233-017-0005-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turan</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bozaykut-B&#x00FC;k</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Analyzing perceived healthcare service quality on patient related outcomes.</article-title> <source><italic>Int J Qual Serv Sci.</italic></source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>478</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>97</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/IJQSS-04-2015-0042</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abidova</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>da Silva</surname> <given-names>PA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moreira</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The mediating role of patient satisfaction and perceived quality of healthcare in the emergency department.</article-title> <source><italic>Medicine.</italic></source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>100</volume>:<issue>e25133</issue>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Eberle</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Milan</surname> <given-names>GS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dorion</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Service quality dimensions and customer satisfaction in a Brazilian university context.</article-title> <source><italic>Benchmarking.</italic></source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>23</volume>:<fpage>1697</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>716</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/BIJ-09-2014-0089</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pakur&#x00E1;r</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haddad</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nagy</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Popp</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ol&#x00E1;h</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The service quality dimensions that affect customer satisfaction in the Jordanian banking sector.</article-title> <source><italic>Sustainability.</italic></source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<issue>1113</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su11041113</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hafeez</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muhammad</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The impact of service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty programs on customer&#x2019;s loyalty: evidence from banking sector of Pakistan.</article-title> <source><italic>Int J Bus Soc Sci.</italic></source> (2012) <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>200</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nwosu</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Edo</surname> <given-names>G. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jalloh</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Mediating role of patient trust in the impact of perceived physician communication on treatment adherence and its implication in healthcare industry.</article-title> <source><italic>Science, Engineering and Health Studies (2023)</italic></source> <fpage>23050026</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>23050026</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Umoke</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Umoke</surname> <given-names>PCI</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nwimo</surname> <given-names>IO</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nwalieji</surname> <given-names>CA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Onwe</surname> <given-names>RN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Emmanuel Ifeanyi</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Patients&#x2019; satisfaction with quality of care in general hospitals in Ebonyi State, Nigeria, using SERVQUAL theory.</article-title> <source><italic>SAGE Open Med.</italic></source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<issue>205031212094512</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/2050312120945129</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
